Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 31 Aug 2007 09:21:54 -0700
From:      "Jack Vogel" <jfvogel@gmail.com>
To:        "Tom Judge" <tom@tomjudge.com>
Cc:        "freebsd-net@freebsd.org" <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>, Andre Oppermann <andre@freebsd.org>, John Baldwin <jhb@yahoo-inc.com>
Subject:   Re: vlan filtering
Message-ID:  <2a41acea0708310921ic12931bt86e76f3e9fbf5556@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <46D7E4B8.4030609@tomjudge.com>
References:  <2a41acea0708301622j6b4eeab9h62576dcfd1325b0a@mail.gmail.com> <46D7E4B8.4030609@tomjudge.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 8/31/07, Tom Judge <tom@tomjudge.com> wrote:
> Jack Vogel wrote:
> > I was just working on a bug in the Oplin driver that had me look
> > a bit more at VLAN code than I had previously.
> >
> > FreeBSD has apparently never used the hardware vlan filtering
> > that our hardware can do, is there a systemic reason for this,
> > or has the code lagged in its use of the system?
> >
> > I at least don't understand how the driver is supposed to get
> > the vlan id to set in the filter, am I just unenlightened? :)
> >
> > If this is doable I can add code into em as well as ixgbe.
> >
> > Jack
>
> This isn't really directly related but could be important for some
> users.  If you where to use this would the card handle Q in Q properly
> with the filter on or would there have to be some form of administrative
> option to turn the hardware filter on/off?

I like flexibility, so having it be a feature that could be enabled or not
seems like a good idea to me. Once I understand the situation we'll
see.

Cheers,

Jack



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?2a41acea0708310921ic12931bt86e76f3e9fbf5556>