Date: Mon, 28 Dec 1998 00:44:33 -0500 (EST) From: Kenneth Wayne Culver <culverk@wam.umd.edu> To: David Greenman <dg@root.com> Cc: Greg Lehey <grog@lemis.com>, "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@zippy.cdrom.com>, Mike Smith <mike@smith.net.au>, Warner Losh <imp@village.org>, committers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: The recent fracas involving danes, war axes and wounded developers Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.3.95q.981228004412.25381A-100000@rac1.wam.umd.edu> In-Reply-To: <199812280536.VAA05896@implode.root.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, 27 Dec 1998, David Greenman wrote: > >> I might mention that the policy I proposed to Jordan didn't say > >> "unanimous"...it didn't say "majority", either, but that's actually what > >> I had in mind. Mike's comment about a quorum is a good one, though, and > >> I think this needs to be a majority of core members, not a majority of > >> those who vote on the issue. Does this satisfy the concerns? > > > >You might consider somewhere between unanimous (difficult enough to > >achieve that it might cripple the idea) and a simple majority. How > >does two thirds sound? > > I thought about that, but it is difficult to get a quorum large enough > to satisfy that requirement. Most of the time only 2/3rds or less of the > core team members cast a vote. I won't offer any excuses as to why this > is the case. > Maybe 2/3rds of the people that reply??? Kenneth culver To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.GSO.3.95q.981228004412.25381A-100000>