Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2008 04:55:52 +0200 From: cpghost <cpghost@cordula.ws> To: "Kevin Oberman" <oberman@es.net> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: sched_ule(1) and sched_4bsd(1) Message-ID: <20080630045552.51d3531f@epia-2.farid-hajji.net> In-Reply-To: <20080630022655.D7B0945047@ptavv.es.net> References: <20080630012402.GA30723@epia-2.farid-hajji.net> <20080630022655.D7B0945047@ptavv.es.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, 29 Jun 2008 19:26:55 -0700 "Kevin Oberman" <oberman@es.net> wrote: > > Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2008 03:24:02 +0200 > > From: cpghost <cpghost@cordula.ws> > > Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@freebsd.org > > > > Hello, > > > > the man-pages sched_4bsd(1) and sched_ule(1) as of > > FreeBSD 7.0-STABLE #0: Sat Jun 28 22:44:54 CEST 2008 > > both state that SCHED_4BSD is the default scheduler. > > Yet SCHED_ULE is now in GENERIC, and not SCHED_4BSD! > > > > Are the man-pages wrong, or is it better to change > > SCHED_ULE back to SCHED_4BSD in a custom kernel > > config file? I'm using SCHED_ULE on UP systems for > > quite some time now, and there don't seem to be any > > regressions so far... > > Looks like the man pages are a bit outdated. 4BSD was in GENERIC in > 7.0-RELEASE, but it was changed to ULE in stable shortly after the > release of 7.0. Ah, thank you. ;) Regards, -cpghost. -- Cordula's Web. http://www.cordula.ws/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20080630045552.51d3531f>