Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 22 Sep 2000 17:49:42 -0600
From:      Warner Losh <imp@village.org>
To:        Cy Schubert - ITSD Open Systems Group <Cy.Schubert@uumail.gov.bc.ca>
Cc:        freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: sysinstall DOESN'T ASK, dangerous defaults! 
Message-ID:  <200009222349.RAA72314@harmony.village.org>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 22 Sep 2000 16:28:27 PDT." <200009222328.e8MNSTF13435@cwsys.cwsent.com> 
References:  <200009222328.e8MNSTF13435@cwsys.cwsent.com>  

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <200009222328.e8MNSTF13435@cwsys.cwsent.com> Cy Schubert - ITSD Open Systems Group writes:
: So my question is why the second TCP session between rshd/kshd and 
: rsh/krsh?  Is it for a full-duplex session?

So that stderr can be connected back to the original person w/o having
to have the two fd's multiplexed.

Warner


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200009222349.RAA72314>