Date: Mon, 12 Aug 1996 20:35:19 -0500 (EST) From: "John S. Dyson" <toor@dyson.iquest.net> To: terry@lambert.org (Terry Lambert) Cc: koshy@india.hp.com, freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: FreeBSD vs. NT Stability Message-ID: <199608130135.UAA00150@dyson.iquest.net> In-Reply-To: <199608121658.JAA25522@phaeton.artisoft.com> from "Terry Lambert" at Aug 12, 96 09:58:51 am
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > There are many ways to thrash NT to death. The test program that sparked > this debate thrashes the buffer cache significantly because of the lack > of per FS object working set restrictions. In VMS, this would be a > tunable. > I have some working code for FreeBSD that implements a system-wide quota of per-vnode dirty buffer space (those are the only ones that cannot be reclaimed immediately.). John
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199608130135.UAA00150>