Date: Mon, 07 Apr 2003 16:20:26 -0400 (EDT) From: John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org> To: Peter Wemm <peter@FreeBSD.org> Cc: Perforce Change Reviews <perforce@freebsd.org> Subject: RE: PERFORCE change 28149 for review Message-ID: <XFMail.20030407162026.jhb@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <200304050333.h353XRdE099823@repoman.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 05-Apr-2003 Peter Wemm wrote: > http://perforce.freebsd.org/chv.cgi?CH=28149 > > Change 28149 by peter@peter_overcee on 2003/04/04 19:32:58 > > oops. s/l/q/ in write_rflags() > > Affected files ... > > .. //depot/projects/hammer/sys/x86_64/include/cpufunc.h#7 edit > > Differences ... > > ==== //depot/projects/hammer/sys/x86_64/include/cpufunc.h#7 (text+ko) ==== > > @@ -357,7 +357,7 @@ > static __inline void > write_rflags(u_long ef) On an unrelated topic: A lot of these cpufunc things should use register_t rather than int or long. This would have slightly simplified porting them to hammer and reduce the diffs. -- John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org> <>< http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/ "Power Users Use the Power to Serve!" - http://www.FreeBSD.org/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?XFMail.20030407162026.jhb>