Date: Wed, 8 Nov 2000 21:25:03 +0000 (GMT)
From: Terry Lambert <tlambert@primenet.com>
To: msmith@FreeBSD.ORG (Mike Smith)
Cc: Michael.Reifenberger.gp@icn.siemens.de (Reifenberger Michael), current@FreeBSD.ORG ('current@freebsd.org')
Subject: Re: unwanteed halt & powerdown under -current (linuxerator?)
Message-ID: <200011082126.OAA27348@usr08.primenet.com>
In-Reply-To: <200011031156.eA3BuhF04069@mass.osd.bsdi.com> from "Mike Smith" at Nov 03, 2000 03:56:43 AM
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > Not really. See my previous mail. > > It seems that a SYSV4 Syscall maps to the evil call. > > Unless you had the SVR4 module loaded, it would still have been run as a > FreeBSD binary, which would give you exactly the same behaviour. Is it possible to refuse to run the binary, unless it is FreeBSD branded? It would seem that FreeBSD branding should be there, and that a non-matching branding should be result in a failure. Terry Lambert terry@lambert.org --- Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present or previous employers. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200011082126.OAA27348>