Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 22:14:04 +0000 (UTC) From: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" <bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net> To: Philipp Wuensche <cryx-freebsd@h3q.com> Cc: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org Subject: Re: HEADS UP: r185435 multi-IPv4/v6/no-IP jails in HEAD Message-ID: <20081211221113.S97918@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net> In-Reply-To: <49418BD9.8080105@h3q.com> References: <20081201085229.D80401@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net> <20081201122937.81475f0zhfsjya4o@webmail.leidinger.net> <6ae50c2d0812021800x791d2cfeh45d590de120f76df@mail.gmail.com> <1228483574.2805.499.camel@soundwave.ws.pitbpa0.priv.collaborativefusion.com> <86skp2l804.fsf@ds4.des.no> <1228507529.2805.539.camel@soundwave.ws.pitbpa0.priv.collaborativefusion.com> <49418BD9.8080105@h3q.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
This message is in MIME format. The first part should be readable text, while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools. --0-734655037-1229033570=:97918 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; CHARSET=ISO-8859-1; FORMAT=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Content-ID: <20081211221255.P97918@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net> On Thu, 11 Dec 2008, Philipp Wuensche wrote: Hi, > Brian A. Seklecki wrote: >> On Fri, 2008-12-05 at 20:47 +0100, Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav wrote: >>> The question is, does it change existing behavior, or just add new >>> functionality? >> >> The syntax semantics should be backward compatible, so likely the >> latter. > > Not entirely true, the jls output is totaly different than before and > breaks third-party applications like jailaudit and ezjail. This is only true if you use any of the new features. In case you use single-IPv4 jails as before there should be absoultely no change in the output format. /bz PS: I trimmed the CC: list as noone was able to adhere to Reply-To. --=20 Bjoern A. Zeeb The greatest risk is not taking one. --0-734655037-1229033570=:97918--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20081211221113.S97918>