Date: Tue, 06 Jul 1999 16:31:20 -0700 From: Ken Marx <kmarx@bigshed.com> To: erich@FreeBSD.org Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: FreeBSD Port: linux_lib-2.6.1 Message-ID: <378291C8.107425BF@bigshed.com>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi,
I already asked the 'questions' alias about this, but I'm really stuck
and thought you might know.
Can you explain what's up with linux_{lib,devel} wrt pthreads?
Is it supported?
If I use libc.so < libc.so.6, ld complains that libpthreads.so.0 needs
libc.so.6; If I use libc.so.6, I get segv's somewhere near a call to
getpid() in the loader (according to ktrace/linux_kdump).
Seems like lib_r might help if I could compile it under linux_devel?
Even then, seems like some stuff might go missing. E.g., IO_putc et al.
Even tried putting in the POSIX P1003.1B stuff into the kernel, but
no effect.
Any clues?
Thanks very much!
k.
--
Ken Marx, kmarx@bigshed.com
I'm not sure I understand the problem. Why don't we simply guard the keys to
the kingdom and manage the care and feeding of the executive summary.
- http://cgi.bigshed.com/~kmarx/cgi-bin/speak.cgi
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?378291C8.107425BF>