Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2003 18:28:42 +0100 (CET) From: "Julien Gabel" <jpeg@thilelli.net> To: "Maxim Konovalov" <maxim@macomnet.ru> Cc: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: How stable is 4.9-RELEASE proving to be? Message-ID: <41988.194.119.92.65.1067448522.squirrel@webmail.thilelli.net> In-Reply-To: <20031029195029.B57490@news1.macomnet.ru> References: <200310291641.JAA27852@lariat.org> <20031029195029.B57490@news1.macomnet.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>> users stick with 4.8-RELEASE is not encouraging. If 4.9 isn't stable, we >> may be forced to jump over to OpenBSD 3.4 for new production systems. Regarding the recent paper "Benchmarking BSD and Linux", which results can be found at http://bulk.fefe.de/scalability/, I don't know if it is a good idea to prefer OpenBSD - even the 3.4 - over FreeBSD. -- -jg.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?41988.194.119.92.65.1067448522.squirrel>