Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2007 16:42:43 +0200 From: des@des.no (Dag-Erling =?iso-8859-1?Q?Sm=F8rgrav?=) To: Dejan Lesjak <dejan.lesjak@ijs.si> Cc: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org, Florent Thoumie <flz@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: What can I do? Message-ID: <86veglpgyk.fsf@dwp.des.no> In-Reply-To: <200703281611.01544.dejan.lesjak@ijs.si> (Dejan Lesjak's message of "Wed, 28 Mar 2007 16:11:00 %2B0200") References: <46022E59.7030407@jabbe.de> <46026D62.4010009@FreeBSD.org> <861wj9sjz6.fsf@dwp.des.no> <200703281611.01544.dejan.lesjak@ijs.si>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Dejan Lesjak <dejan.lesjak@ijs.si> writes: > On Wednesday 28 of March 2007, Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav wrote: > > I suspect you're way past the point where new issues show up faster > > than you can fix them. The only way out of this tar pit is to merge > > everything into the ports tree so other port maintainers have a real > > incentive to help you out. > Not quite just yet. We should at least fix trivial failures (mostly > plist fixes) that would otherwise keep things like qt and gtk from > building. Uh? I thought those had been taken care of a long time ago. I maintain(ed) a small Linux distro at work, and I completed the transition to modular X.org about a year and a half ago. I appreciate the difference in scale, but still, I'm starting to wonder if you guys still have all your marbles. DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav - des@des.no
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?86veglpgyk.fsf>