Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 15 Sep 1999 16:33:13 -0400 (EDT)
From:      Adrian Filipi-Martin <adrian@ubergeeks.com>
To:        Brad Knowles <blk@skynet.be>
Cc:        freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: Vinum performance testing...
Message-ID:  <Pine.BSF.3.96.990915162833.461B-100000@lorax.ubergeeks.com>
In-Reply-To: <v0420551eb4057ffd4cfe@[195.238.1.121]>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 15 Sep 1999, Brad Knowles wrote:

> At 12:29 PM -0400 1999/9/15, Adrian Filipi-Martin wrote:
> 
> 	I can say that the few tests I do recall running that provided 
> more detail, CPU utilization from vinum was very minimal.  One test I 
> have a record of running on this same configuration reported the 
> following:
> 
> /usr/local/bin/rawio -s 45660241920 -v 1 /dev/vinum/data1
> >Test name:                  anon
> >Transfer count:            32768
> >Record count:              16384
> >Process count:                 8
> >Device size:          2147483647
> >Test    ID           Time      KB/sec    %User    %Sys  %Total  Reads   Writes
> >RR     anon    781.799011      2700.7     0.1      6.7     6.8  131072  0
> >SR     anon    994.598389      4318.3     0.1      7.3     7.3  131072  0
> >RW     anon   2871.548584       736.3     0.0      1.9     1.9  0       131072
> >SW     anon    195.158478     22007.6     0.2     60.8    60.9  0       131072
> 
> 	Of course, this was with older versions of vinum and rawio, and I 
> believe that the %Sys percentage reported was a bug that was fixed 
> long ago.  Except for the Sequential Write test, you can see that the 
> overall CPU utilization was less than 10% across the board, and less 
> than 2% for the Random Write test (although that number seems 
> suspiciously low and might also have been the result of a bug which 
> has almost certainly been fixed since).

	This is in line with what I would expect for RAID 0 and 1.  CPU
usage just makes the I/O performance measurements more compelling.   CPU
will also be more interesting when it comes to measuring the RAID 5
performance later.

	Basically, I'm just playing devil's advocate.  If someone asks me
about vinum performance under FreeBSD, your graphs/stats are great to
point to.  CPU utilization is a favorite whipping-boy for people convinced
hardware RAID is the only useful kind of RAID.

cheers,

	Adrian
--
[ adrian@ubergeeks.com -- Ubergeeks Consulting -- http://www.ubergeeks.com/ ]



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.96.990915162833.461B-100000>