Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2005 22:59:57 -0700 From: stephen@dino.dnsalias.com (Stephen J. Bevan) To: Greg 'groggy' Lehey <grog@FreeBSD.org> Cc: FreeBSD-net@freebsd.org, Jeremie Le Hen <jeremie@le-hen.org>, Gianmarco Giovannelli <gmarco@masternet.it> Subject: Re: Problems with gif tunnels Message-ID: <17066.32221.665435.20574@localhost.localdomain> In-Reply-To: <20050611052801.GQ87456@wantadilla.lemis.com> References: <20050608084946.GI41050@obiwan.tataz.chchile.org> <20050608095703.GM64194@wantadilla.lemis.com> <20050608195837.Q65103@Neo-Vortex.net> <20050608104053.GK41050@obiwan.tataz.chchile.org> <20050608233136.GX64194@wantadilla.lemis.com> <20050608234559.GS41050@obiwan.tataz.chchile.org> <20050609001004.GB64194@wantadilla.lemis.com> <6.2.1.2.2.20050609080446.05c897d0@83.149.160.120> <20050609074439.GT41050@obiwan.tataz.chchile.org> <17066.30185.318421.273508@localhost.localdomain> <20050611052801.GQ87456@wantadilla.lemis.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Greg 'groggy' Lehey writes: > Certainly that confusion exists. But it doesn't seem to be the > problem here: the original poster (Gianmarco?) stated that he had > tried to set up a tunnel with gif(4), which would mean an IP-IP > tunnel. If you were referring to Gianmarco then as the following exerpts from his message show, he initially used nos-tun(4) rather than gif(4) because he thought gif(4) did GRE ... > They insist to use the ipip tunnel (p:4) and I think I should use > the nos-tun interface ... ... > Now I see I could simply use the gif interface (which I wrongly > suppose did only GRE tunnel :-) to connect to an ipip linux > tunnel. ...
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?17066.32221.665435.20574>