Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2000 18:00:40 +1000 (Australia/NSW) From: Darren Reed <avalon@coombs.anu.edu.au> To: pavol_adamec@tempest.sk (Pavol Adamec) Cc: freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: ipf or ipfw (was: log with dynamic firewall rules) Message-ID: <200007270800.SAA23526@cairo.anu.edu.au> In-Reply-To: <397FE9A4.1C1B9215@tempest.sk> from "Pavol Adamec" at Jul 27, 2000 09:49:56 AM
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In some mail from Pavol Adamec, sie said: > > Siobhan Patricia Lynch wrote: > > > ipfilter has to be flushed and reloaded, I don;t have that luxury > > > > ipfw I can add rules on the fly. > > > > Sorry, but ipf can add rules on the fly too. > As for ipf and ipfw - their capabilities are almost equal. [...] IP Filter 4.0 will change that quite dramatically :-) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200007270800.SAA23526>