Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 22:16:16 +0200 From: Andrea Venturoli <ml@netfence.it> To: "Andrew W. Nosenko" <andrew.w.nosenko@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: portupgrade -R order Message-ID: <4A131390.2070400@netfence.it> In-Reply-To: <6161f3180905190911j4c09ce0cnb743ae7fbb59b5fc@mail.gmail.com> References: <4A12CD95.6040204@netfence.it> <6161f3180905190911j4c09ce0cnb743ae7fbb59b5fc@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Andrew W. Nosenko ha scritto: >> I would guess openoffice.org requires gcc43 to build, but then, shouldn't it >> be handled *before*? > > Whether OOo requires gcc-4.3 indeed? Not "customized" version of > gcc-3.4 (ooo-gcc if I recall correctly...)? No. I'm really talking about lang/gcc43. > About another ports: the was majority of prorts doen't require any > specific GCC version supplied in ports, but use system-default gcc > instead (/usr/bin/gcc), therefore, order of building gcc-4.3 from > ports is irrelevant. Ok, but I guess we have two cases: a) OOO requires gcc43 (either directly or through another dependency): then I guess gcc43 should be build before OOO; b) OOO does not require gcc43 at all: then I see no reason for it to be upgraded. In any case I see no point in building it after OOO. Perhaps I'm missing something? (Again, you can substitute OOO and gcc with other ports in different scenarios). bye & Thanks av.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4A131390.2070400>