Date: Wed, 4 Dec 1996 18:06:37 -0700 (MST) From: Nate Williams <nate@mt.sri.com> To: Don Lewis <Don.Lewis@tsc.tdk.com> Cc: Nate Williams <nate@mt.sri.com>, Richard Wackerbarth <rkw@dataplex.net>, freebsd-security@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Sendmail 8.8.4 questions... Message-ID: <199612050106.SAA12859@rocky.mt.sri.com> In-Reply-To: <199612050054.QAA02606@salsa.gv.ssi1.com> References: <nate@mt.sri.com> <199612050054.QAA02606@salsa.gv.ssi1.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> } > >I don't think so. Changes have been committed since 2.1.6, but not > } > >since it was frozen. > } > > } > WRONG! Look at the ctm updates in the archive. They are triggered by SOME > } > change in the CVS tree for the 2_1_0 tag. > } > } I didnt' see any that came after. I think you're confused. > > I just got a ctm update for -stable in the mail today. It looks like the > first one since 2.1.6.1, which is only about a week and a half old. I forgot that Satoshi made a change to bsd.port.mk last night. Whee... > } > >2.1.* is dead in my mind, and I suspect many others. It lived long past > } > >it's usefulness in the developers mind. > > I'll agree that it's dead as far as new development, but I'll have it > running here for quite a while yet. I'd like to see security patches > released as needed. How would they be distributed? Nate
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199612050106.SAA12859>