Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2003 13:34:25 -0000 From: Nakata Maho <chat95@mbox.kyoto-inet.or.jp> To: dev@porting.openoffice.org, Pavel@Janik.cz Cc: openoffice@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [porting-dev] Towards OpenOffice.org ports for FreeBSD 5.2-RELEASE Message-ID: <20031127.223434.846935079.chat95@mbox.kyoto-inet.or.jp> In-Reply-To: <m3y8u4l4vg.fsf@Janik.cz> References: <3FC30806.8000502@mailru.com> <20031125.213349.596611807.chat95@mbox.kyoto-inet.or.jp> <m3y8u4l4vg.fsf@Janik.cz>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi, Pavel > > so I can say OOo 1.1 ports are almost ready for 5.2-RELEASE. > > how did you solved http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=22253 > > Do you still mkdir soffice.cfg in the ports? Yes we do. this is serious problem, which prohibits to do QA. I recieved some mails about `I want to use OOo just *now*, there are no packages for our langs, so I had tried by myself from ports, but in vain, how can I fix it?' well, there are serious demands for them. 5.2-RELEASE is approaching, ports, src are now frozen, so just what I want to say is: `it works for me, and I'm 99% sure that this port will work for 5.2-RELEASE, so if you want working package for 5-series, please do cvsup ports tree, and upgrade userland kernel or wait for 5.2-RELEASE, it is for you'. --maho
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20031127.223434.846935079.chat95>