Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2005 14:22:07 +0200 From: Dejan Lesjak <dejan.lesjak@ijs.si> To: Ceri Davies <ceri@submonkey.net> Cc: Andrey Slusar <anrays@gmail.com>, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, Nobutaka MANTANI <nobutaka@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: xemacs vs emacs Message-ID: <200508181422.08187.dejan.lesjak@ijs.si> In-Reply-To: <20050818101822.GK55885@submonkey.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Ceri Davies wrote: > > I don't care if these ports conflict. Is there a way to install them > both despite the presence of CONFLICTS? I don't think you can without removing CONFLICTS from Makefile before installing, but I'd also like to have them both installed on some places... > Ceri > > PS If the xemacs port were to install ctags, etags, etc. as xctags then > the conflict could maybe be avoided. I haven't checked the full list > but those are glaring. FWIW, NetBSD pkgsrc seems to prefix conflicting files with emacs- and xemacs-. Here are the cvsweb links to their plist files: http://cvsweb.netbsd.org/bsdweb.cgi/pkgsrc/editors/xemacs/PLIST?rev=1.12&content-type=text/x-cvsweb-markup http://cvsweb.netbsd.org/bsdweb.cgi/pkgsrc/editors/emacs/PLIST?rev=1.11&content-type=text/x-cvsweb-markup I've CCed the maintainers of emacs, xemacs21-mule and xemacs-mule-devel to see what they think; other versions seem unmaintained as far as I've checked. Dejan
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200508181422.08187.dejan.lesjak>