Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 18 Feb 1997 20:20:10 +0100
From:      roberto@keltia.freenix.fr (Ollivier Robert)
To:        hackers@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: CTC Linux Mandate
Message-ID:  <19970218202010.DV57051@keltia.freenix.fr>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.NEB.3.94.970217155903.189C-100000@misery.sdf.com>; from Tom Samplonius on Feb 17, 1997 16:00:27 -0800
References:  <19970217225113.MC38075@keltia.freenix.fr> <Pine.NEB.3.94.970217155903.189C-100000@misery.sdf.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
According to Tom Samplonius:
>   Huh?  Doesn't 2.2 and higher use phkmalloc which according to reports is
> *better* than gnumalloc?  Plus, isn't gnumalloc being depreciated out of
> FreeBSD?

2.2 yes. I think the original poster was talking about 2.1.*... There are a
lot a people still in 2.1.* so my comment still apply.
-- 
Ollivier ROBERT    -=- The daemon is FREE! -=-    roberto@keltia.freenix.fr
  FreeBSD keltia.freenix.fr 3.0-CURRENT #39: Sun Feb  2 22:12:44 CET 1997



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19970218202010.DV57051>