Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 15 Sep 1999 17:55:03 -0700 (MST)
From:      "Chad R. Larson" <chad@DCFinc.com>
To:        adrian@ubergeeks.com
Cc:        blk@skynet.be, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: Vinum performance testing...
Message-ID:  <199909160055.RAA12030@freeway.dcfinc.com>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.3.96.990915162833.461B-100000@lorax.ubergeeks.com> from Adrian Filipi-Martin at "Sep 15, 99 04:33:13 pm"

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
As I recall, Adrian Filipi-Martin wrote:
> 	This is in line with what I would expect for RAID 0 and 1.  CPU
> usage just makes the I/O performance measurements more compelling.   CPU
> will also be more interesting when it comes to measuring the RAID 5
> performance later.

And you'd particularly want to check CPU on the RAID 5 with a disc
down.  Life is worst when you have to do the pre-reads to be able to
calculate the XORs when writing and reading a 4 plex that just used
to be a 5 plex.

Load and response during catchup would also be a useful data point.


	-crl
--
Chad R. Larson (CRL15)   602-953-1392   Brother, can you paradigm?
chad@dcfinc.com         chad@larsons.org          larson1@home.net   
DCF, Inc. - 14623 North 49th Place, Scottsdale, Arizona 85254-2207


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199909160055.RAA12030>