Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2003 13:21:16 -0700 From: "Kevin Oberman" <oberman@es.net> To: John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org> Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Odd ACPI behavior Message-ID: <20030929202116.C3ED35D08@ptavv.es.net> In-Reply-To: Message from John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org> <XFMail.20030929160425.jhb@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2003 16:04:25 -0400 (EDT) > From: John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org> > > > On 29-Sep-2003 Kevin Oberman wrote: > > I recently noticed that, when I boot with ACPI on my IBM T30, I get > > errors trying to probe the BIOS disabled sio1. This does not happen > > under apm and happens twice(?) when booting with ACPI and happens even > > though I have the line 'hint.sio.1.disabled="1"' in /boot/device.hints. > >>From my dmesg: > > sio0: type 16550A > > sio1: configured irq 3 not in bitmap of probed irqs 0 > > sio1: port may not be enabled > > acpi_cmbat0: <Control method Battery> on acpi0 > > acpi_cmbat1: <Control method Battery> on acpi0 > > acpi_acad0: <AC adapter> on acpi0 > > sio1: configured irq 3 not in bitmap of probed irqs 0 > > sio1: port may not be enabled > > > > Any idea why this is happening? It does not seem to be a serious > > issue, but it is very odd. > > > > acpidump output, full dmesg, config and whatever available on request. > > Do you kldload a module at some point during your boot? If so, that > would explain the double probe. Yes, it would, but I am not loading any kernel modules except the slightly automatic loads of ACPI, itself and a few others which should not cause a probe: ntfs, linux, linprocfs, and daemon_saver. -- R. Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer Energy Sciences Network (ESnet) Ernest O. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (Berkeley Lab) E-mail: oberman@es.net Phone: +1 510 486-8634
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030929202116.C3ED35D08>