Date: Sun, 6 Jun 2010 16:59:57 -0700 From: "David E. Thiel" <lx@FreeBSD.org> To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org, freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Our aging base system krb5 [heimdal] Message-ID: <20100606235957.GE3022@redundancy.redundancy.org> In-Reply-To: <AANLkTimRWT9cubiEOg2bZujxvc_DHsYNu2V5r4-fyXpd@mail.gmail.com> References: <AANLkTik213g_8W2ocr3mCCb2EED8RBXsYBavdYll1PI_@mail.gmail.com> <19467.61790.690469.182207@hergotha.csail.mit.edu> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1006061221130.73670@legolas.orthanc.ca> <4C0BF89F.90908@FreeBSD.org> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1006061240460.73670@legolas.orthanc.ca> <4C0BFBAB.9030808@FreeBSD.org> <AANLkTimRWT9cubiEOg2bZujxvc_DHsYNu2V5r4-fyXpd@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, Jun 06, 2010 at 08:15:33PM +0000, b. f. wrote: > What incompatibilities exist between that latest versions of the MIT > Kerberos and Heimdal implementations? How does des@ feel about it, > since libpam and openssh may have to be altered? My experience is a few years old, but last time I tried working with them together, I found the protocol used by kadmin was incompatible between the two implementations.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20100606235957.GE3022>