Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 19 Oct 2001 00:16:15 +0200 (CEST)
From:      Cyrille Lefevre <clefevre@citeweb.net>
To:        Doug Barton <DougB@DougBarton.net>
Cc:        Gregory Neil Shapiro <gshapiro@FreeBSD.ORG>, arch@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: New sendmail users (was Re: HEADS UP: Apache port change from  nobody:nogroup to www:www planned)
Message-ID:  <200110182216.f9IMGFU10016@gits.dyndns.org>
In-Reply-To: <3BCF1A60.13C78B28@DougBarton.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Doug Barton wrote:
> 	My only objection is the name of the user for uid 25. It should be
> smtp, both to match the service name for the port, and to make it more
> generic which will help us avoid the inevitable whining and crying from
> the anti-sendmail crowd. Port 26 is currently unassigned, so it's as
> good a candidate for your mailnull user as any. I think that name is a
> little wacky, but since that's the default in sendmail and there's no
> contenders for port 26, it's as good as any I suppose. :)

do you care about default user names and uids of other platforms
such as HP-UX, Solairs, IRIX, AIX, etc. ? as I remember me smtp is
already used by Solaris an is 0. this may cause problems in a
NIS/NFS environment...

Cyrille.
-- 
Cyrille Lefevre                 mailto:clefevre@citeweb.net

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200110182216.f9IMGFU10016>