Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2003 20:44:32 -0700 From: Terry Lambert <tlambert2@mindspring.com> To: Brad Knowles <brad.knowles@skynet.be> Cc: Bill Moran <wmoran@potentialtech.com> Subject: Re: Antivirus for (mailservers on) FreeBSD Message-ID: <3EE948A0.F6661BB7@mindspring.com> References: <5.2.1.1.2.20030612202321.02e28008@194.184.65.4> <20030612193524.GA31199@grumpy.dyndns.org> <3EE8DB83.4040609@potentialtech.com> <200306122006.55906.dkelly@HiWAAY.net> <a0600120bbb0ee73f012c@[10.0.1.2]>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Brad Knowles wrote: > At 10:16 PM -0400 2003/06/12, Bill Moran wrote: > > while scanning outgoing emails for spam is > > simply a waste of CPU cycles. > > False. You can be held liable (including criminal liability) if > you could have reasonably prevented something like this, and chose > not to. I wish someone would apply this logic to SubSeven and the holes in Windows products that permit it to spread. What, it doesn't apply in that case? Why not? Tell me so I can contrive an example where it doesn't apply to the case you claim it applies to here... -- Terry
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3EE948A0.F6661BB7>