Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 08:39:05 -0500 From: eculp@encontacto.net To: freebsd-ports <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Re: latest firefox. linux-flashplugin and nspluginwrapper don't want to work together. Message-ID: <20070926083905.zr6eeisfswkg4c8c@intranet.encontacto.net> In-Reply-To: <46FA5A0B.2030404@dva.dyndns.org> References: <20070925163539.pgse608uso00sw80@intranet.encontacto.net> <46FA5A0B.2030404@dva.dyndns.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Quoting "Boris S." <bst2006@dva.dyndns.org>: > eculp@encontacto.net schrieb: >> Also, I would really like to know if anyone has flash9 working with =20 >> somewhat reasonable stability and sound or a way to make the =20 >> server-side think that flash7 is flash8 or above? There are more =20 >> and more sites asking for flash8+ and very few that won't work with =20 >> flash7. > > > Because of the raising demand of flash9 i switched yesterday to =20 > linux-firefox-2.0.0.7 and flash9. > This combination is much more stable and compatible than bsd-firefox =20 > with flash6 or 7 and wrapper. > I'm using -CURRENT (AMD64) as of 21. Sept., with Linuxulator =20 > switched to "2.6.16" Mode and installed linux_base-fc6. > I did't test sound and things like youtube didn't work. But I'm very =20 > happy now because MY often visited websites are much more useable now. Thanks a lot Boris. That is the same problem I'm seeing, the =20 proliferation of flash for links on websites, that really sucks but .. =20 .. I'll give all a try once I get upgraded to current on this machine. ed > Boris > >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20070926083905.zr6eeisfswkg4c8c>