Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2003 15:40:49 -0700 (PDT) From: Jason Stone <freebsd-current@dfmm.org> To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: procfs problem Message-ID: <20030929151737.D55021@walter> In-Reply-To: <20030929114844.GA2318@rot13.obsecurity.org> References: <3F781270.3020708@mikulas.com> <20030929132758.R35443@beagle.fokus.fraunhofer.de> <20030929114844.GA2318@rot13.obsecurity.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 > > > JM>map02# strace -p 730 > > > JM>strace: open("/proc/...", ...): No such file or directory > > > JM>trouble opening proc file > > > > > You must mount procfs. > > > > > > # fstab; > > > proc /proc procfs rw 0 0 > > > > The bi-weekly status messages have been claiming that all the common > > debugging tools except for truss have been converted to work without > > procfs, since procfs is now deprecated. Does that not include strace, or > > is there something else wrong here? > > strace is not part of FreeBSD. Oh - I didn't think that truss was either, which lead me to believe that someone had gone through ports and fixed a bunch of them. Is someone working on fixing the strace and truss ports yet? Are there other popular ports that depend on procfs? -Jason -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Freud himself was a bit of a cold fish, and one cannot avoid the suspicion that he was insufficiently fondled when he was an infant. -- Ashley Montagu -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (FreeBSD) Comment: See https://private.idealab.com/public/jason/jason.gpg iD8DBQE/eLTxswXMWWtptckRAtTdAKCiiZ1ffDqyLx0ZdT8pKEGmv1LX/wCgrTbx M3/ZMG8QAIivfTdyfm3zNWM= =s77n -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030929151737.D55021>