Date: Sat, 19 Mar 2005 11:11:19 +1030 From: "Daniel O'Connor" <doconnor@gsoft.com.au> To: "Amandeep Pannu" <aman@chamkila.org> Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Freebsd 5.0 NICs issue Message-ID: <200503191111.27191.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> In-Reply-To: <41763.69.36.228.194.1111167267.squirrel@69.36.228.194> References: <44497.69.36.228.194.1110474073.squirrel@69.36.228.194> <200503181647.26346.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> <41763.69.36.228.194.1111167267.squirrel@69.36.228.194>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--nextPart1776094.bU1MFIGdQr Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Sat, 19 Mar 2005 04:04, Amandeep Pannu wrote: > ifconfig em1 alias inet 205.229.165.8 netmask 255.255.255.255 > > Can I? Not sure, I would expect you'd get complaints from ARP because both NIC's a= re=20 on the same segment. > I need the other NIC for some internal operations. Errm.. Why do they need to be on the same subnet? Are they connected to the= =20 same ethernet segment? Are you trying to do bridging? ie more details please :) =2D-=20 Daniel O'Connor software and network engineer for Genesis Software - http://www.gsoft.com.au "The nice thing about standards is that there are so many of them to choose from." -- Andrew Tanenbaum GPG Fingerprint - 5596 B766 97C0 0E94 4347 295E E593 DC20 7B3F CE8C --nextPart1776094.bU1MFIGdQr Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (FreeBSD) iD4DBQBCO3U35ZPcIHs/zowRArapAJi/IUrJ380O0rLnQ0Od5beSIAsKAJ9TZjDa pfhI/Wf8eiqCweuAzqWT3g== =hMS4 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1776094.bU1MFIGdQr--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200503191111.27191.doconnor>