Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2011 19:53:38 +0000 From: Marcus Reid <marcus@blazingdot.com> To: Tom Evans <tevans.uk@googlemail.com> Cc: Attilio Rao <attilio@freebsd.org>, George Mitchell <george+freebsd@m5p.com>, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: SCHED_ULE should not be the default Message-ID: <20111214195337.GA90758@blazingdot.com> In-Reply-To: <CAFHbX1%2B5PttyZuNnYot8emTn_AWkABdJCvnpo5rcRxVXj0ypJA@mail.gmail.com> References: <4EE1EAFE.3070408@m5p.com> <CAJ-FndDniGH8QoT=kUxOQ%2BzdVhWF0Z0NKLU0PGS-Gt=BK6noWw@mail.gmail.com> <4EE2AE64.9060802@m5p.com> <4EE88343.2050302@m5p.com> <CAFHbX1%2B5PttyZuNnYot8emTn_AWkABdJCvnpo5rcRxVXj0ypJA@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 05:54:15PM +0000, Tom Evans wrote: > brought forward more complaints about interactivity in X (I've never > noticed this, and use a FreeBSD desktop daily). .. that was me, but I forgot to add that it almost never happens, and it can only be triggered when there are processes that want to take up 100% of the CPU running on the system along with X and friends. Don't want to spread FUD, I've been happily using FreeBSD on the desktop for a decade and ULE seems to work great. Marcus
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20111214195337.GA90758>