Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 25 May 2001 11:17:14 -0700
From:      "David O'Brien" <obrien@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Mikhail Teterin <mi@aldan.algebra.com>
Cc:        kris@obsecurity.org, Jim.Pirzyk@disney.com, current@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: amd feature request (Re: AMD config file question.)
Message-ID:  <20010525111714.C95361@dragon.nuxi.com>
In-Reply-To: <200105251356.f4PDujB40310@aldan.algebra.com>; from mi@aldan.algebra.com on Fri, May 25, 2001 at 09:56:42AM -0400
References:  <20010525023340.B54585@dragon.nuxi.com> <200105251356.f4PDujB40310@aldan.algebra.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, May 25, 2001 at 09:56:42AM -0400, Mikhail Teterin wrote:
> Now that smbfs is in, can amd be used to mount smb shares? Of course, it
> can. But  can we have something  like "host" type, where  all smb-shares
> available from a  host are automaticly accessible? This may  be added to
> the host-type together  with NFS, or be made part  of a separate smbhost
> type. I'd vote for the first one, personally...

Send me a tested patch and I'll consider it.  I want to make sure you
won't be causing any problems in the generic case.
 
-- 
-- David  (obrien@FreeBSD.org)

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010525111714.C95361>