Date: Tue, 18 Feb 1997 22:40:34 -0700 From: Warner Losh <imp@village.org> To: "Daniel O'Callaghan" <danny@panda.hilink.com.au> Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, gnat@frii.com Subject: Re: Core dumps in suid processes (again) Message-ID: <E0vx4lk-0005WT-00@rover.village.org> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 19 Feb 1997 14:05:00 %2B1100." <Pine.BSF.3.91.970219135715.8268Y-100000@panda.hilink.com.au> References: <Pine.BSF.3.91.970219135715.8268Y-100000@panda.hilink.com.au>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <Pine.BSF.3.91.970219135715.8268Y-100000@panda.hilink.com.au> "Daniel O'Callaghan" writes: : Will that work with screen, where the program is setuid root but runs : (and is kill -11 able) as me? I guess I mean, does the : has-been-setuid flag keep its state even when euid==ruid? When the uid and euid are set at any time, then a flag in the proc structure gets set and you will no longer get a core dump. Warner
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?E0vx4lk-0005WT-00>