Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2015 13:01:04 +0200 From: Michelle Sullivan <michelle@sorbs.net> To: Glen Barber <gjb@FreeBSD.org> Cc: herbert@oslo.ath.cx, Mark Linimon <linimon@lonesome.com>, freebsd-stable <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>, Brandon Allbery <allbery.b@gmail.com>, Jason Unovitch <jason.unovitch@gmail.com> Subject: Re: 10.2-Beta i386..what's wrong..? Message-ID: <55B21AF0.1030806@sorbs.net> In-Reply-To: <20150724010003.GO84931@FreeBSD.org> References: <55B17B7A.4080402@gmail.com> <20150723234805.GK84931@FreeBSD.org> <55B18488.9060602@sorbs.net> <20150724004026.GA1370@lonesome.com> <CAKFCL4VVtLspj%2BRQxSHjyQxAhixPuMiQoehoA2MYWeSgqTTwAQ@mail.gmail.com> <20150724004343.GM84931@FreeBSD.org> <20150724004443.GC1370@lonesome.com> <20150724004939.GN84931@FreeBSD.org> <55B18CA8.1020909@sorbs.net> <20150724010003.GO84931@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Glen Barber wrote: > On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 02:54:00AM +0200, Michelle Sullivan wrote: > >> >> Actually I'm quite sucessfully running zfs on i386 (in a VM) ... here's >> the trick (which leads me to suspect ARC handling as the problem) - when >> I get to 512M of kernel space or less than 1G of RAM available system >> wide, I export/import the zfs pool... Using this formula I have uptimes >> of months... I haven't yet tried the 'ARC patch' that was proposed >> recently... >> >> > > Which FreeBSD version is this? Things changed since 10.1-RELEASE and > what will be 10.2-RELEASE enough that I can't even get a single-disk ZFS > system (in VirtualBox) to boot on i386. During 10.1-RELEASE testing, > I only saw problems with multi-disk setup (mirror, raidzN), but the > FreeBSD kernel grew since 10.1-RELEASE, so this is not unexpected. > 9.2-i386 and 9.3-i386 - I don't run 10 on anything. -- Michelle Sullivan http://www.mhix.org/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?55B21AF0.1030806>