Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 24 Jul 2000 15:59:59 -0500 (CDT)
From:      Mike Silbersack <silby@silby.com>
To:        Adrian Chadd <adrian@FreeBSD.ORG>
Cc:        Terje Elde <terje@elde.net>, Robert Watson <rwatson@FreeBSD.ORG>, Sheldon Hearn <sheldonh@uunet.co.za>, =?iso-8859-1?Q?Joachim_Str=F6mbergson?= <watchman@ludd.luth.se>, Greg Lewis <glewis@trc.adelaide.edu.au>, freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: Status of FreeBSD security work? Audit, regression and crypto swap?
Message-ID:  <Pine.BSF.4.21.0007241556510.5736-100000@achilles.silby.com>
In-Reply-To: <20000724210042.O62551@ywing.creative.net.au>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

On Mon, 24 Jul 2000, Adrian Chadd wrote:

> Whats wrong with a bdev io layer like vinum/ccd which does crypto?
> Then you could swap and filesystem to your block devices to your hearts
> content with whatever filesystem you wanted?

Encrypting at that low of a level wouldn't be very useful in the long
run.  For an encrypted filesystem to be truly useful, each user's files
are encrypted with their own key.  A partition-wide encryption doesn't
protect anything if you get root hacked on your box.

And a crypto swap should use as many keys as possible (see the openbsd
implementation paper.)

Mike "Silby" Silbersack



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.21.0007241556510.5736-100000>