Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 18 Jun 98 12:37:30 -0400
From:      Timothy J Luoma <luomat+FreeBSD@luomat.peak.org>
To:        Tim Gerchmez <fewtch@serv.net>
Cc:        freebsd-newbies@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: Major hardware reorganization...
Message-ID:  <199806181637.MAA27806@luomat.peak.org>
In-Reply-To: <3.0.5.32.19980618064338.007f1100@mx.serv.net>
References:  <3.0.5.32.19980618064338.007f1100@mx.serv.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
	Author:        Tim Gerchmez <fewtch@serv.net>
	Original-Date: Thu, 18 Jun 1998 06:43:38 -0700
	Message-ID:    <3.0.5.32.19980618064338.007f1100@mx.serv.net>

> Win95 is the only OS that supports all my hardware, and for
> certain operations is the fastest (it definitely boots the quickest
> of the 3 OS's, BSD second, Win NT third)

Well Win95 should reboot fast, given all the the times it has to reboot (not  
a flame, just a fact.... many/most changes under Win95 require a reboot to  
update the system).

BSD does take quite awhile to boot... I wonder how much of it might be  
trimmed down if a custom kernel was built to the specifics of only what  
hardware was on the machine.

TjL



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-newbies" in the body of the message



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199806181637.MAA27806>