Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2003 22:11:59 +0000 (UTC) From: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" <bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net> To: Edwin Groothuis <edwin@FreeBSD.org> Cc: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org, <portmgr@FreeBSD.org>, Christian Kratzer <ck@cksoft.de> Subject: Re: ports/46009: New port: openldap-2.1 Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.44.0301202147420.36882-100000@e0-0.zab2.int.zabbadoz.net> In-Reply-To: <200301200731.h0K7VR6n040893@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, 19 Jan 2003, Edwin Groothuis wrote: Hi, > Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-ports-bugs->portmgr > Responsible-Changed-By: edwin > Responsible-Changed-When: Sun Jan 19 23:30:05 PST 2003 > Responsible-Changed-Why: > Portmgr, could you please make a repo-copy of net/openldap2 to > net/openldap21 ? > > > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=46009 why do you want to copy over openldap2 ? This PR is supposed to be an entirely new port for openldap version 2.1. Openldap 2.0 is somewhat older but still used by a lots of other products. Openldap 2.1 is what is considered stable now. The 2.1 source is quite different from 2.0. There have been some major enhancements... IMHO a diff from openldap2 to openldap21 would make not much sense. So both ports should be there co-existing (at least for some time) I think. Why should openldap21 start with complete 2.0 cvs history predicting that this port had been there before openldap 2.1.x had been released ? or did I miss s.th. ? PS: expect an update to openldap 2.1.12 within the next days including some smaller beauty fixes to pkg-* and Makefile too. -- Greetings Bjoern A. Zeeb bzeeb at Zabbadoz dot NeT 56 69 73 69 74 http://www.zabbadoz.net/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports-bugs" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.44.0301202147420.36882-100000>