Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 14 Aug 1996 08:26:21 -0700 (PDT)
From:      zounds@INNOSOFT.COM
To:        Craig Harding <C.R.Harding@massey.ac.nz>
Cc:        freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: sio issues (silo overflows on a pentium, locked in ttywait, etc...)
Message-ID:  <Pine.PMDF.3.91.960814082526.541068897A-100000@INNOSOFT.COM>
In-Reply-To: <199608140213.TAA27489@freefall.freebsd.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help


On Wed, 14 Aug 1996, Craig Harding wrote:

> Thomas David Rivers <ponds!rivers@dg-rtp.dg.com> writes:
> 
> >Seems to me a Pentium 75 should be able to keep up with 19200, and 
> >hopefully be able to do much better...  am I the only one tripping
> >over these sio issues?  Is there some other magic to setting rts/cts
> >that I don't know about?  Is there any hope my 386dx with 16550As will
> >be able to handle anything higher than 19200 without locking up?
> 
> As a data point: I'm running 2.0.5-RELEASE on a 486SX25 with two serial 
> ports containing real 16550As. Both ports are locked at 57600 and users 
> happily dialin and use one line interactively (on a 14k4 modem) while the 
> other line on the 28k8 modem gets 3400cps receiving approx. 80MB of 
> compressed news per day via Taylor UUCP. No silo overflows.
> 
> I think the previous message relating to custom single-chip emulation of a 
> 16550A may explain your problems.
> 
I am wondering if the 19200 speed is because of the lack of hardware 
handshaking cables.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.PMDF.3.91.960814082526.541068897A-100000>