Date: Tue, 27 Feb 1996 22:48:16 -0800 From: "Amancio Hasty Jr." <hasty@rah.star-gate.com> To: "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@ki.net> Cc: hackers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Pentium gcc (pgcc) in ports... Message-ID: <199602280648.WAA00377@rah.star-gate.com> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 27 Feb 1996 23:40:17 EST." <Pine.BSF.3.91.960227233710.18679C-100000@ki.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Well, the general consesus is that someone drop the ball and in some programs like mpeg_play we lost oh about 30% performace from a previous pgcc version. Amancio >>> "Marc G. Fournier" said: > > Hiya... > > I'm just grabbing down pl6 of pgcc, and was wondering what the > general concensous(sp?) is on it. I know that it is generally accepted > that 2.7.2 is too buggy to be used for stuff like compiling XFree and > the kernel and whatnot...does anyone have any similar or opposite comments > about pgcc? > > Thanks... > > Marc G. Fournier | POP Mail Telnet Acct DNS Hosting > System | WWW Services Database Services | Knowledge, > Administrator | | Information and > scrappy@ki.net | WWW: http://www.ki.net | Communications, Inc > >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199602280648.WAA00377>