Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2005 02:22:50 -0700 From: Pete Carah <pete@altadena.net> To: Eric Anholt <eta@lclark.edu> Cc: x11@freebsd.org Subject: Re: New compaq, new radeon id Message-ID: <20050721092250.GB5341@users.altadena.net> In-Reply-To: <1121906078.4260.53.camel@leguin> References: <20050719100314.GA20584@users.altadena.net> <200507202004.23055.jkim@FreeBSD.org> <1121904708.4260.51.camel@leguin> <200507202017.27570.jkim@FreeBSD.org> <1121906078.4260.53.camel@leguin>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Jul 20, 2005 at 05:34:38PM -0700, Eric Anholt wrote: > On Wed, 2005-07-20 at 20:17 -0400, Jung-uk Kim wrote: > > On Wednesday 20 July 2005 08:11 pm, Eric Anholt wrote: > > > > If you just want 2D, you have to patch xorg-server. If you want > > > > to experiment on 3D accel, all of the above. And maybe DRI also. > > > > > > Actually, if you just want 2d, xorg-server-snap should support it. > > > > Oh, cool! But, it doesn't work, at least on this hardware. See pciconf in previous reply. And it's hard to debug spontaneous reboots without planting code somewhere. Is there an "invariants"-like thing for Xserver? > > > For 3D, I'm guessing that, like other RS* chipsets, it's going to > > > need agp_ati.c to work. agp_ati.c should be nearly working (see > > > i386/75251), I'm guessing there's just some bug left to be fixed, > > > probably by someone with hardware. > > > > Uh, it's AMD64 chipset. Doesn't he need agp_amd64.c instead? > > Maybe? It would be nice if that just worked. Noted in reply to first note - agp_amd64 has only AMD, nvidia, and Via chips mentioned in its table, no ATI. And dmesg for boot_verbose doesn't mention either agp or drm, as it is. (from cvsup about 6pm this past evening.) I think I'll wait for the agp_ati to show in the tree; maybe I could get ahold of it some other way (I don't have access to any of the internal repositories). -- Pete
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050721092250.GB5341>