Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 13 Mar 2005 17:45:49 -0600
From:      Chris <racerx@makeworld.com>
To:        Bart Silverstrim <bsilver@chrononomicon.com>
Cc:        freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: If I have portmanager, do I need portupgrade?
Message-ID:  <4234D0AD.5070004@makeworld.com>
In-Reply-To: <932306becc748b381634aac3df646c87@chrononomicon.com>
References:  <20050313200543.B290F4BE6D@ws1-1.us4.outblaze.com> <200503131220.02607.ringworm01@gmail.com> <4234A4C5.2090109@cis.strath.ac.uk> <200503131246.03193.ringworm01@gmail.com> <932306becc748b381634aac3df646c87@chrononomicon.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Bart Silverstrim wrote:

>
> Portmanager has made most of my updating a no-brainer, and I've been 
> thankful that Michael was fast to fix problems when I reported what 
> little I ran into.  And this is on an in-use production server....I 
> trust it with the updates, so either it's a program that works very 
> well or I've been very lucky :-)
>
> I'd definitely recommend new users try using Portmanager for keeping 
> their ports up to date.  It is simple and straightforward to use and 
> doesn't confuse newer users with details like manipulating the ports 
> index.  It's just a "portmanager -u" and off it goes...check in once 
> in awhile to see how it's progressing and that's it.  Makes updating 
> as simple as the process of installing a new port :-)
>
> -Bart


Agreed - I to use it on a production boxen - and as Bart has said, 
either it's a great product or I have been lucky also.

Best regards,
Chris



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4234D0AD.5070004>