Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2005 06:22:42 -0400 From: Tom Rhodes <trhodes@FreeBSD.org> To: juli mallett <jmallett@FreeBSD.org> Cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org, src-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/lib/libufs Makefile Message-ID: <20050826062242.734ffae4@localhost> In-Reply-To: <20050825195416.GA65980@toxic.magnesium.net> References: <200508251022.j7PAMWFO030767@repoman.freebsd.org> <20050825195416.GA65980@toxic.magnesium.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 25 Aug 2005 09:54:16 -1000 juli mallett <jmallett@FreeBSD.org> wrote: > * Tom Rhodes <trhodes@FreeBSD.org> [ Date: 2005-08-25 ] > [ w.r.t. cvs commit: src/lib/libufs Makefile ] > > trhodes 2005-08-25 10:22:30 UTC > > > > FreeBSD src repository > > > > Modified files: > > lib/libufs Makefile > > Log: > > Hook getino.3 up to the build and link it to putino.3. > > > > PR: 83820 > > This is wrong. As the PR states it was purposely not hooked up. > inode.c doesn't have functions which look like the interfaces you've > just published, and there isn't even a putino(3) in there. If the > cause of the confusion is the manpage being listed in Xr's or > something, then comment out the Xr's. This is very obviously wrong, > if you try to use what's in the manpage I committed. Probably it > shoudln't be in CVS at all. The reason I put it there at the time is > that it was ready and inode.c was about ready to hit CVS, but that > got dropped. Now, if you want to help me remember what P4 tree that > inode.c was in, and pick up whereever I left off, that'd be awesome. Let me understand real quick, it was purposely not hooked up because it was the only file not updated? I mean, I can back this out, no problem; however, I fail to see why nothing is going on with this code. No clue on the branch, sorry. Otherwise, I fear lack of free time is keeping me from much these days. :( -- Tom Rhodes
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050826062242.734ffae4>