Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 9 Jun 2008 14:29:26 +0100
From:      Anton Shterenlikht <mexas@bristol.ac.uk>
To:        Kris Kennaway <kris@freebsd.org>
Cc:        Tobias Hoellrich <thoellri@adobe.com>, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: size of executable - g95 vs gfortran42 - shared libs?
Message-ID:  <20080609132926.GA18121@mech-aslap33.men.bris.ac.uk>
In-Reply-To: <4847F31B.7090404@FreeBSD.org>
References:  <20080605132106.GA51988@mech-aslap33.men.bris.ac.uk> <E891374F64B9194FB5BFFF28935811CA02A3EC77@namail2.corp.adobe.com> <20080605135015.GA52233@mech-aslap33.men.bris.ac.uk> <4847F31B.7090404@FreeBSD.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Jun 05, 2008 at 04:07:23PM +0200, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
> >g95.out:
> >        libm.so.5 => /lib/libm.so.5 (0x280c5000)
> >        libc.so.7 => /lib/libc.so.7 (0x280db000)
> 
> ^-- this one doesn't link to a dynamic fortran library, so it is 
> presumably statically linked, explaining the size.  Look into how the 
> file was constructed (e.g. the command used to link the binary).
> 

Kris, many thanks.
I have confirmed this with Andy Vaught (g95 main developer).

-- 
Anton Shterenlikht
Room 2.6, Queen's Building
Mech Eng Dept
Bristol University
University Walk, Bristol BS8 1TR, UK
Tel: +44 (0)117 928 8233 
Fax: +44 (0)117 929 4423



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20080609132926.GA18121>