Date: Wed, 17 Mar 1999 14:19:27 +0100 From: livensw@rc.bel.alcatel.be (Wim Livens) To: kjc@csl.sony.co.jp Cc: freebsd-atm@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: ATLQ support for HARP ? Message-ID: <199903171319.OAA28626@btm4fw.rc.bel.alcatel.be>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> >> I want to use the HARP ATM driver with ALTQ. > >> This driver isn't listed in the 'supported drivers' list for ALTQ. > >> I'm just using UBR PVCs, one for each vif. > >> So, what must be done to make this (part of the) driver work with ALTQ ? > >> How much work ? > > Currently, ALTQ doesn't work with HARP. > > I haven't had time to figure out how the different settings of HARP > interacts with queueing at the interface level. > > ALTQ over ATM isn't simple since the ATM drivers have their own > interface abstraction and queueing... If I only have one PVC per logical interface and using ALTQ to limit the bandwidth to each logical interface such that the sum is =< than lets say 130 Mbps, I suppose there will be no congestion in the atm driver. Do you think this can work ? We're building a research testbed to play with ALTQ etc. I'm just using ATM as a wire to have these logical interfaces to avoid the hassle of multiple ethernet cards and cables. Thanks for the help so far, Wim Livens. Alcatel - Corporate Research Center wim.livens@alcatel.be Fr. Wellesplein 1 livensw@rc.bel.alcatel.be B-2018 Antwerpen Tel: +32 3 240 7570 Belgium. Fax: +32 3 240 9932 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-atm" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199903171319.OAA28626>