Date: Tue, 30 May 1995 16:15:01 -0700 From: asami@CS.Berkeley.EDU (Satoshi Asami | =?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCQHUbKEI=?= =?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCOCsbKEIgGyRCOC0bKEI=?=) To: chuckr@Glue.umd.edu Cc: yergeau@gloworm.Stanford.EDU, FreeBSD-Ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: c++filt Message-ID: <199505302315.QAA01965@forgery.CS.Berkeley.EDU> In-Reply-To: <Pine.SUN.3.91.950530184917.8215C-100000@cappuccino.eng.umd.edu> (message from Chuck Robey on Tue, 30 May 1995 18:51:15 -0400 (EDT))
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
* > Most of guts for c++filt is in cplus-dem.c, which is included with * > GNU liberty. If you look at the Makefiles and the source... * It's not our package, it's GNU's, and I don't think cutting it up that * way is an ethical thing to do. I will post a request to them to release * it separately, but until then, I guess you have to make binutils to get it. Hey guys, I just realized that we already have this in our source tree! :O >> ls /usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/gdb/libiberty/cplus-dem.c 65 /usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/gdb/libiberty/cplus-dem.c I'm not sure what you mean by ethical, but I don't think they will mind if we make a separate program out of it. After all they already put a target for it in the Makefile (in the original...the one we have doesn't) and a #ifdef MAIN to support the compilation. It's too late to put this in 2.0.5R core distribution, but I'll see if I can still make a port out of it. It will be one of the smallest (and fastest if you already have the source, no need to ftp) ports around! :) Satoshi
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199505302315.QAA01965>