Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 16 Sep 2006 23:36:15 -0500
From:      pauls@utdallas.edu
To:        freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: When is BuildWorld necessary?
Message-ID:  <E6D60374F5ABF4FF75A51AA3@paul-schmehls-powerbook59.local>
In-Reply-To: <450CCC90.6000605@verysmall.org>
References:  <200609161541.38002.bob@tania.servebbs.org> <450C55FA.5070701@verysmall.org> <200609161639.47705.bob@tania.servebbs.org> <450CCC90.6000605@verysmall.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--==========3C5005AD715FBEC385A9==========
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline

--On September 17, 2006 6:18:24 AM +0200 pobox@verysmall.org wrote:

> Bob wrote:
>> On Saturday 16 September 2006 15:52, pobox@verysmall.org wrote:
>>
>>> But I have one question - do you rebuild the world on a remote machine
>>
>> Sorry; I am a newbie at FreeBSD, and have never done a buildworld :-( I
>> have  spent lots of time on Linux, Solaris, and SCO, but this is my
>> first cut at  BSD.
>>
>> Just from past NIX experience though, I would never rebuild an entire
>> OS  remotely without having someone onsite to push the On/Off switch
>> when the  inevitable happens :-(
>
> We have someone to push the switch. I just thought if it is possible to
> be done without engaging the support.
>
No one has mentioned the security/freebsd-update port.  With that you can=20
apply updates to the kernel and world without having to build them *if*=20
(and only if!) you are running a GENERIC kernel.  For remote=20
administration, this may be a good option for some.

I've done a number of build world and kernel routines without a problem.

make buildworld
make buildkernel
make installkernel
reboot

mergemaster -p
make install world
mergemaster
reboot

This has worked for me on three different systems, all of which are easily =

accessible if something goes wrong.  I have one server that's about 20=20
miles away and much more critical than the others (in terms of uptime and=20
accessibility) *and* I don't have remote access to the server through a=20
KVM or similar.  For that one I use freebsd-update, because I don't want=20
to have to suddenly jump in the car and drive 30 minutes (while the server =

is down) to fix a problem.

Paul Schmehl (pauls@utdallas.edu)
Adjunct Information Security Officer
The University of Texas at Dallas
http://www.utdallas.edu/ir/security/

--==========3C5005AD715FBEC385A9==========--




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?E6D60374F5ABF4FF75A51AA3>