Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2007 14:40:47 +0200 From: Ivan Voras <ivoras@fer.hr> To: thwang@mail.nhcue.edu.tw Cc: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Subject: Re: the performance of SAS is not better than SCSI in FreeBSD, WHY? Message-ID: <461CD74F.4020103@fer.hr> In-Reply-To: <224a745a0704110509o17941a25tc1d4b8080f0841e6@mail.gmail.com> References: <224a745a0704092137h67f5f463w6b355535a6b8415f@mail.gmail.com> <evgqk5$du4$1@sea.gmane.org> <224a745a0704110245n30b2859ew7673406e33b61b10@mail.gmail.com> <461CB798.8010501@fer.hr> <224a745a0704110509o17941a25tc1d4b8080f0841e6@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig944B08B1B71F83DEC2F1A7F6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Tzu-Hua Wang wrote: > Do you mean that RAID 0 perform better than RAID 1? >=20 > How about RAID 5? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Standard_RAID_levels --------------enig944B08B1B71F83DEC2F1A7F6 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with SUSE - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFGHNdVldnAQVacBcgRAqNkAKDSfWaRR7CBb73p/5YFJ+UHXJ6UrgCdGqqm xgIoa5qdWbc4hiJ4rFoKJvY= =pWUC -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig944B08B1B71F83DEC2F1A7F6--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?461CD74F.4020103>