Date: Thu, 4 Apr 2002 12:41:02 -0500 From: Greg Pavelcak <gpav@som.umass.edu> To: William Carrel <william.carrel@infospace.com> Cc: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@ofug.org>, chat@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Anti-Unix Site Runs Unix Message-ID: <20020404174102.GA53600@oitunix.oit.umass.edu> In-Reply-To: <1AFD7E6F-47EB-11D6-BF98-003065D5E9A4@infospace.com> References: <xzppu1f1oh5.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> <1AFD7E6F-47EB-11D6-BF98-003065D5E9A4@infospace.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Apr 04, 2002 at 08:43:34AM -0800, William Carrel wrote: > On Thursday, April 4, 2002, at 07:18 AM, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: > >To summarize: > > > >A) Microsoft developers are smart > >B) Microsoft developers don't document their code > >C) Microsoft does not require developers to document their code > >D) Programmers who document their code are smart > > > >There are no conclusions possible based on the above four premises. > Surely you jest. One could validly conclude: A) Microsoft developers are smart B) Microsoft developers don't document their code C) Microsoft does not require developers to document their code D) Programmers who document their code are smart A or B A and B A or C D or The Pope hates tuna fish. Just to name a very few. Greg To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020404174102.GA53600>