Date: Mon, 02 Sep 2013 08:00:00 +0200 From: John Marino <freebsd.contact@marino.st> To: Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@FreeBSD.org> Cc: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, John Marino <marino@FreeBSD.org>, ports-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r325857 - in head/devel/opencl: . files Message-ID: <52242960.3060700@marino.st> In-Reply-To: <20130902014500.GF43972@FreeBSD.org> References: <201309011425.r81EPB4v049325@svn.freebsd.org> <20130902014500.GF43972@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 9/2/2013 03:45, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: > On Sun, Sep 01, 2013 at 02:25:11PM +0000, John Marino wrote: >> New Revision: 325857 >> URL: http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/325857 >> >> @@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ >> >> PORTNAME= opencl >> PORTVERSION= 1.2 >> -PORTREVISION= 2 >> +PORTREVISION= 5 > > Wow, now *that's* a BUMP! :) Why so high? The PR seemed to indicate that it something the maintainer was internally tracking it. I couldn't figure out if he was bumping each one so we wouldn't get the patches mixed up, or if he had some kind of internal configuration control. Since the important thing is that the number changes and increases, I didn't feel like having a back-and-forth over 3 vs 5. I may have made the wrong decision (well, probably did) but I felt the consequences were minor in any case. John
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?52242960.3060700>