Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2005 23:57:13 -0300 From: Marcus Grando <marcus@corp.grupos.com.br> To: Rong-En Fan <rafan@infor.org> Cc: sem@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: mail/policyd name conflict Message-ID: <425DDC09.7070802@corp.grupos.com.br> In-Reply-To: <20050412213158.GA41666@svm.csie.ntu.edu.tw> References: <200503210441.j2L4fQRB021246@svm.csie.ntu.edu.tw> <20050322084911.GA21666@heechee.tobez.org> <20050322090810.GY34807@k7.mavetju> <42401591.9090306@corp.grupos.com.br> <20050322133325.GA1849@heechee.tobez.org> <20050412213158.GA41666@svm.csie.ntu.edu.tw>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi, > mail/postfix-policyd-sqlgrey > mail/postfix-policyd-postgrey mail/postfix-policyd-spf mail/postfix-policyd-greylist For me is the best way. > > A bit long name? If in this case, I would suggest that we don't > touch them and just rename mail/policyd to mail/policyd-spf > and the new one will be mail/policyd (just google policyd, it is > in the second result). I don't think so. Long name is not problem. This week i send PR to rename mail/policyd to mail/postfix-policyd-spf Regards -- Marcus Grando Grupos Internet S/A marcus(at)corp.grupos.com.br
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?425DDC09.7070802>