Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 26 Apr 2000 23:23:36 -0600
From:      Warner Losh <imp@village.org>
To:        Greg Lehey <grog@lemis.com>
Cc:        "Paul Richards.width" <paul@originative.co.uk>, freebsd-arch@freebsd.org, Chuck Robey <chuckr@picnic.mat.net>, Robert Watson <rwatson@freebsd.org>, FreeBSD Committers <cvs-committers@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: Where to discuss architectural issues (was: How about building modules along with the kernel? (was: cvs commit: src/sys/modules/syscons/fire fire_saver.c src/sys/modules/syscons/rain rain_saver.c src/sys/modules/syscons/warp warp_saver.c)) 
Message-ID:  <200004270523.XAA50106@harmony.village.org>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 27 Apr 2000 09:42:23 %2B0930." <20000427094223.F43932@freebie.lemis.com> 
References:  <20000427094223.F43932@freebie.lemis.com>  <20000426124729.D40207@freebie.lemis.com> <Pine.BSF.4.21.0004252346240.331-100000@picnic.mat.net> <20000425234016.D1022@dragon.nuxi.com> <20000426164824.D43932@freebie.lemis.com> <3906CF74.1AEBFD09@originative.co.uk> 

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <20000427094223.F43932@freebie.lemis.com> Greg Lehey writes:
: I think -arch is the right place.  I'd just like to make sure that
: -committers doesn't get left out, and the best way I can think of to
: do that is to add -committers to the -arch list.

No.  Don't add commiters to -arch.  Many of them are people that just
do ports or don't care about global issues.  If they did care, they
should subscribe to -arch.

-arch is the right place.

Warner




To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200004270523.XAA50106>