Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2004 19:01:33 +1000 From: Peter Jeremy <PeterJeremy@optushome.com.au> To: Ruslan Ermilov <ru@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: What is Stable Message-ID: <20040823090133.GB43698@cirb503493.alcatel.com.au> In-Reply-To: <20040823070343.GG59140@ip.net.ua> References: <6E7EB9E8-F4BD-11D8-94CF-003065781ED0@runbox.com> <20040823045620.GG15251@electra.cse.Buffalo.EDU> <20040823070343.GG59140@ip.net.ua>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 2004-Aug-23 10:03:43 +0300, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: >Can you clarify, what will be the policy of the RELENG_4 after it >"becomes an Errata Branch"? Will it be passed to Security Officer, >and no new featuress could be committed to this branch? Presumably it will be treated the same way as RELENG_2_2 and RELENG_3. The 'Code-Freeze Status' table at http://www.freebsd.org/releng/index.html shows both are "open" with no restrictions - since there will be no further releases, re@ is not involved. (I suspect that the schedule for it to become an Errata Branch depends on the success or otherwise of 4.11 and 5.3 - it's possible that unforeseen circumstances could result in a 4.12). -- Peter Jeremy
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040823090133.GB43698>