Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2014 01:25:52 +1100 From: nano <nanotek@bsdbox.co> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: weird error messages with various ports Message-ID: <52E90F70.6070000@bsdbox.co> In-Reply-To: <Pine.NEB.4.64.1401291401090.12416@faeroes.freeshell.org> References: <20140127120519.Horde.zk6gGzrJZ8n-kUHavzPiTw1@webmail.df.eu> <20140127191858.78a3fa5d@X220.alogt.com> <20140127114919.GA66024@elfsechsundzwanzig.de> <20140127200326.026e6c35@X220.alogt.com> <20140127121011.GA68344@elfsechsundzwanzig.de> <20140127203002.37fbb036@X220.alogt.com> <Pine.NEB.4.64.1401291401090.12416@faeroes.freeshell.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 30/01/2014 1:06 AM, Charlie wrote: > > The second advantage being that if you have several machines to > maintain, you no longer have to wait for each one to build ports. Just > build once using poudriere, fire up a web server to host the package > repo, and point all the machines at that repo. Build once, install many! > > Charlie > Assuming all systems are the same architecture and require the same build options. Sure, Poudriere on amd64 can build for i386 too, but that's not necessarily any more efficient in some scenarios. Would be much nicer if port trees were broken less often. -- bsdbox.co
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?52E90F70.6070000>